A lot of people believe that they are bound to go to court when they do not find a solution to a dispute by discussing with the other party, directly or through their counsel.
Yet, before seizing a State court, it is worth carefully considering the possibility to resort to extrajudicial dispute resolution, through arbitration, conciliation, mediation or other means.
The effectiveness of these means is now proven, as well as the time, money and energy savings they offer to the parties.
Arbitration is a well-known dispute resolution method on the international scale. It allows the parties to obtain from an arbitral tribunal, chosen by them and composed of a sole arbitrator or three persons, a decision (award) having the same legal value as a State Court’s judgement.
Compared to proceedings before a State court, it offers the parties the advantage of :
The terms conciliation and mediation are not used everywhere and by everyone in the same way. Sometimes, the term “conciliation” is reserved to the intervention of a third party designated by the State (e.g. a judge), any intervention by a private third party being called “mediation”.
In Switzerland, conciliation and mediation are both generally defined as a confidential process whose goal is to reach, as much as possible, an agreement between the parties putting an end to a dispute. They imply one or several meetings, during which the conciliator or mediator will guide the parties towards the possible solutions, so that they can choose at the end the most adapted to their situation. Contrary to the arbitrator, neither the conciliator nor the mediator is vested with the power of rendering a binding decision.
The differences between conciliation and mediation are therefore essentially related to the way the process will be conducted:
These differences will therefore fade :
When appropriately conducted, conciliation and mediation are effective because the parties are led by the conciliator or mediator to:
More and more lawyers, concerned about protecting their clients’ interests, are now referring their clients to conciliation and mediation.
Their experience has convinced them that the flexibility, speed and cost containment that characterize these processes, combined with the real prospect of obtaining a negotiated solution accepted by all parties, make them first-rate tools in the resolution of disputes.